-
Pediatric Critical Care Medicine : a... Apr 2022To determine the frequency and characteristics of complications of peripherally administered hypertonic saline (HTS) through assessment of infiltration and extravasation.
OBJECTIVES
To determine the frequency and characteristics of complications of peripherally administered hypertonic saline (HTS) through assessment of infiltration and extravasation.
DESIGN
Retrospective cross-sectional study.
SETTING
Freestanding tertiary care pediatric hospital.
PATIENTS
Children who received HTS through a peripheral IV catheter (PIVC).
INTERVENTIONS
None.
MEASUREMENTS AND MAIN RESULTS
We conducted a single-center retrospective review from January 2012 to 2019. A total of 526 patients with 1,020 unique administrations of HTS through a PIVC met inclusion criteria. The primary endpoint was PIVC failure due to infiltration or extravasation. The indication for the administration of HTS infusion was collected. Catheter data was captured, including the setting of catheter placement, anatomical location on the patient, gauge size, length of time from catheter insertion to HTS infusion, in situ duration of catheter lifespan, and removal rationale. The administration data for HTS was reviewed and included volume of administration, bolus versus continuous infusion, infusion rate, infusion duration, and vesicant medications administered through the PIVC. There were 843 bolus infusions of HTS and 172 continuous infusions. Of the bolus administrations, there were eight infiltrations (0.9%). The continuous infusion group had 13 infiltrations (7.6%). There were no extravasations in either group, and no patients required medical therapy or intervention by the wound care or plastic surgery teams. There was no significant morbidity attributed to HTS administration in either group.
CONCLUSIONS
HTS administered through a PIVC infrequently infiltrates in critically ill pediatric patients. The infiltration rate was low when HTS is administered as a bolus but higher when given as a continuous infusion. However, no patient suffered an extravasation injury or long-term morbidity from any infiltration.
Topics: Child; Critical Illness; Cross-Sectional Studies; Humans; Intensive Care Units, Pediatric; Retrospective Studies; Saline Solution, Hypertonic
PubMed: 35180199
DOI: 10.1097/PCC.0000000000002903 -
Blood Purification 2019Intermittent infusion hemodiafiltration is a recently developed convective method of renal replacement therapy using cyclic back-filtration infusion. Quick and regular... (Clinical Trial)
Clinical Trial Observational Study
BACKGROUND
Intermittent infusion hemodiafiltration is a recently developed convective method of renal replacement therapy using cyclic back-filtration infusion. Quick and regular infusion prevents intradialytic hypotension. However, the optimal dose of bolus dialysate infusion required to stabilize blood pressure has not been reported. Here, we investigated the relationship between the dose of bolus dialysate infusion and blood pressure.
SUMMARY
A total of 77 patients on maintenance hemodialysis were enrolled in this study. Dialysate was infused rapidly by backward filtration at a rate of 150 mL/min at 30-min intervals using an automated dialysis machine. The effects with two bolus infusion volumes (100 and 200 mL) were compared, each for an observation period of 2 weeks. Systolic blood pressure (SBP) was measured at the start and at the end of each dialysis session, and the highest SBP and lowest SBP measurements were also recorded. Patients were divided according to dry weight into a <52 kg group and a ≥52 kg group, and various parameters were compared between the 100 and 200 mL bolus infusion volumes in each group. Among patients in the <52 kg group, SBP did not vary at any of the time points. However, for patients in the ≥52 kg group, SBP at the end of treatment was significantly lower in the 100-mL group than in the 200-mL group (141 ± 20 vs. 144 ± 21 mm Hg, p = 0.041), and the minimum SBP was also lower in the 100-mL group than in the 200-mL group (127 ± 17 vs. 131 ± 18 mm Hg, p = 0.010). Key Messages: Among patients with a dry weight of ≥52 kg, blood pressure was more stable when a bolus fluid volume of 200 mL was used, compared with a volume of 100 mL. However, for patients with a dry weight of <52 kg, the significance of the difference in bolus fluid volumes disappeared. Thus, the replacement fluid volume might be better determined based on the patient's dry weight.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
UMIN 000028145, Registered July 10, 2017.
Topics: Aged; Blood Pressure; Dialysis Solutions; Female; Hemodiafiltration; Humans; Hypotension; Male; Middle Aged
PubMed: 31752008
DOI: 10.1159/000503892 -
Minerva Anestesiologica Dec 2014Extended infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics has been advocated as a method for optimizing antibiotic exposure in critically ill patients. The objective of this study... (Comparative Study)
Comparative Study
BACKGROUND
Extended infusion of beta-lactam antibiotics has been advocated as a method for optimizing antibiotic exposure in critically ill patients. The objective of this study was to compare the pharmacokinetics/pharmacodynamics of extended infusion versus bolus infusion of piperacillin and meropenem in critically ill patients with normal renal function.
METHODS
A prospective study of 3 hours extended infusion of meropenem and piperacillin in critically ill patients without renal dysfunction. Results from the extended infusion cohort were compared to previously published bolus infusion data in critically ill patients.
RESULTS
Twenty extended infusion patients (15 piperacillin, 5 meropenem) were compared with 13 bolus infusion patients (8 piperacillin, 5 meropenem). The demographic and clinical characteristics between both groups were not statistically different. Significant pharmacokinetic differences were observed in median (interquartile range) Cmax for both meropenem (extended infusion 17 [12.6-21.9] vs. bolus 85.2 [66.7-140.3]; P=0.01) and piperacillin (extended infusion 76.2 [57.7-92.6] vs. bolus 240.2 [168.5-275.4]; P=0.001). Considerable pharmacokinetic variability existed in each group for both drugs. Compared to bolus infusion, fT>MIC using extended infusion was higher for both drugs: 96% (IQR 71-100%) compared to 77% (IQR 41-93%) for piperacillin (P=0.05) and 82% (IQR 63-89%) compared to 51% (IQR 48-63%) for meropenem (P=0.095); assuming a MIC of 16 mg/L and 2 mg/L respectively.
CONCLUSION
This study confirms that extended infusion in critically ill patients result in advantageous pharmacokinetic profiles by increasing the fT>MIC for piperacillin and meropenem. In a significant subpopulation of critically ill patients with normal renal function, a 100% fT>MIC target is not reached, even with 3-hour extended infusions.
Topics: Aged; Anti-Bacterial Agents; Cohort Studies; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Meropenem; Middle Aged; Piperacillin; Prospective Studies; Thienamycins
PubMed: 24762706
DOI: No ID Found -
Epilepsia Jul 2016An intravenous (IV) formulation of brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, has been developed. We investigated the safety,... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
OBJECTIVES
An intravenous (IV) formulation of brivaracetam (BRV), a selective, high-affinity ligand for synaptic vesicle protein 2A, has been developed. We investigated the safety, tolerability, and pharmacokinetics of adjunctive IV BRV administered as a bolus or infusion to adults with epilepsy.
METHODS
A phase III, multicenter, randomized, four-arm, parallel-group study (NCT01405508) of patients aged 16-70 years with focal or generalized epilepsy uncontrolled by 1-2 antiepileptic drugs was undertaken. The study comprised a 7-day baseline period, a 7-day double-blind run-in period (oral BRV 200 mg/day or placebo [PBO] twice daily [BID]), and 4.5-day open-label evaluation period (IV BRV 200 mg/day BID; 2-min bolus or 15-min infusion, total nine doses). Patients were randomized 1:1:1:1 PBO/BRV bolus; PBO/BRV infusion; BRV/BRV bolus; BRV/BRV infusion. Safety and tolerability were assessed using adverse events, electrocardiography, vital signs, and laboratory assessments. BRV plasma concentrations were measured before and 15 min after the first and last IV doses.
RESULTS
Of the 105 patients randomized (53.3% women; 77.1% white; mean [standard deviation; SD] age 41.6 [12.2] years), 103 (98.1%) completed the study. Treatment-emergent adverse event (TEAE) incidence during IV BRV was similar whether IV BRV was initiated first (70.6%) or followed oral BRV (66.0%), and whether it was administered as a bolus (71.2%) or infusion (65.4%). Injection-related TEAEs were reported by 9.6% of patients following bolus and 11.5% following infusion. No serious TEAEs were reported. IV BRV plasma concentrations were higher after the first dose in the conversion groups than initiation groups, and slightly higher in the bolus arm than the infusion arm; concentrations were similar in all patients after the last IV dose.
SIGNIFICANCE
IV BRV was generally well tolerated, with similar tolerability as a bolus or infusion and independent of de novo administration or as conversion from oral BRV tablets. IV BRV may be an option for patients who are unable to receive oral BRV.
Topics: Adolescent; Adult; Aged; Anticonvulsants; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Double-Blind Method; Epilepsy; Female; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Pyrrolidinones; Treatment Outcome; Young Adult
PubMed: 27221208
DOI: 10.1111/epi.13409 -
Acta Veterinaria Scandinavica Nov 2021Multimodal analgesia consists of the combination of analgesic drugs at low doses to act in different places along the path of pain. Studies with continuous infusion of...
Antinociceptive and analgesic effect of continuous intravenous infusion of maropitant, lidocaine and ketamine alone or in combination in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy.
BACKGROUND
Multimodal analgesia consists of the combination of analgesic drugs at low doses to act in different places along the path of pain. Studies with continuous infusion of analgesic drugs in cats are not common. This study aimed to evaluate the analgesic effect of maropitant, lidocaine and ketamine alone or in combination (intravenous bolus + subsequent continuous intravenous infusion) in the management of acute postoperative pain in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy. Seventy healthy cats undergoing an ovariohysterectomy received a standard anesthetic protocol consisting of acepromazine and morphine, propofol (anesthesia induction), and isoflurane (anesthesia maintenance). The animals were stratified into seven groups (n = 10 in each group): control (CG), maropitant (MG), lidocaine (LG), ketamine (KG), maropitant + lidocaine (LMG), maropitant + ketamine (KMG), and maropitant + lidocaine + ketamine (LKMG). All drugs were injected first as an intravenous bolus and then by continuous intravenous infusion. During surgery, esophageal temperature, respiratory rate, heart rate, oxygen saturation, expired isoflurane concentration, and partial pressure of carbon dioxide at the end of expiration were evaluated at 7 time points. Postoperative pain was evaluated for 6 h after extubation using the visual analogue scale and the UNESP-Botucatu multidimensional composite pain scale for assessing postoperative pain in cats.
RESULTS
Adverse effects related to maropitant, lidocaine and ketamine infusion were not observed. Pain scores were lower in the MG, KG and LG groups when compared to the CG group using both scales. Although pain scores were also lower in all combination groups than CG, more animals in these groups required rescue analgesia compared to MG. This indicates that the postoperative analgesic effect of all drugs, either alone or in combination, confers analgesia, although the combinations did not promote greater analgesia.
CONCLUSIONS
Continuous intravenous infusion of maropitant, lidocaine, and ketamine alone induces postoperative analgesic effect in cats undergoing ovariohysterectomy, but combinations of these drugs did not increase the analgesic effect. No adverse effect was observed with any drug or their combination.
Topics: Analgesics; Animals; Cat Diseases; Cats; Female; Infusions, Intravenous; Ketamine; Lidocaine; Ovariectomy; Pain, Postoperative; Quinuclidines
PubMed: 34838084
DOI: 10.1186/s13028-021-00615-w -
Journal of Aerosol Medicine and... Jan 2022A new real-time method for assessing factors determining aerosol delivery is described. A breath-enhanced jet nebulizer operated in a ventilator/heated humidifier...
A new real-time method for assessing factors determining aerosol delivery is described. A breath-enhanced jet nebulizer operated in a ventilator/heated humidifier system was tested during bolus and continuous infusion aerosol delivery. Tc (technetium)/saline was either injected (3 or 6 mL) or infused over time into the nebulizer. A shielded gamma ratemeter was oriented to count radioaerosol accumulating on an inhaled mass (IM) filter at the airway opening of a test lung. Radioactivity measured at 2-10-minute intervals was expressed as % nebulizer charge (bolus) or % syringe activity per minute infused. All circuit parts were measured and imaged by gamma camera to determine mass balance. Ratemeter activity quantitatively reflected immediate changes in IM: 3 and 6 mL bolus IM% = 16.1 and 18.8% in 6 and 14 minutes, respectively; infusion IM% = 0.64 + 0.13 (run time, min), 0.999. Effect of nebulizer priming and system anomalies were readily detected in real time. Mass balance (basis = dose infused in 90 minutes): IM 39.2%, breath-enhanced jet nebulizer residual 35.5%, circuit parts including humidifier 23.4%, and total recovery 98.1%. Visual analysis of circuit component images identified sites of increased deposition. Real-time ratemeter measurement with gamma camera imaging provides operational feedback during testing procedures and yields a detailed analysis of the parameters influencing drug delivery during mechanical ventilation. This method of analysis facilitates assessment of device function and influence of circuit parameters on drug delivery.
Topics: Administration, Inhalation; Aerosols; Albuterol; Bronchodilator Agents; Drug Delivery Systems; Equipment Design; Nebulizers and Vaporizers; Respiration, Artificial
PubMed: 34227873
DOI: 10.1089/jamp.2021.0019 -
Kidney Research and Clinical Practice Jul 2022Hypernatremia is a common electrolyte disorder in children and elderly people and has high short-term mortality. However, no high-quality studies have examined the...
Efficacy and safety of rapid intermittent bolus compared with slow continuous infusion in patients with severe hypernatremia (SALSA II trial): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.
BACKGROUND
Hypernatremia is a common electrolyte disorder in children and elderly people and has high short-term mortality. However, no high-quality studies have examined the correction rate of hypernatremia and the amount of fluid required for correction. Therefore, in this study, we will compare the efficacy and safety of rapid intermittent bolus (RIB) and slow continuous infusion (SCI) of electrolyte-free solution in hypernatremia treatment.
METHODS
This is a prospective, investigator-initiated, multicenter, open-label, randomized controlled study with two experimental groups. A total of 166 participants with severe hypernatremia will be enrolled and divided into two randomized groups; both the RIB and SCI groups will be managed with electrolyte-free water. We plan to infuse the same amount of fluid to both groups, for 1 hour in the RIB group and continuously in the SCI group. The primary outcome is a rapid decrease in serum sodium levels within 24 hours. The secondary outcomes will further compare the efficacy and safety of the two treatment protocols.
CONCLUSION
This is the first randomized controlled trial to evaluate the efficacy and safety of RIB correction compared with SCI in adult patients with severe hypernatremia.
PubMed: 35545225
DOI: 10.23876/j.krcp.21.193 -
Thrombosis Journal Apr 2022High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) remains a major problem in the acute management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), leading to higher rates of...
BACKGROUND
High on-treatment platelet reactivity (HTPR) remains a major problem in the acute management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI), leading to higher rates of stent thrombosis and mortality. We aimed to investigate a novel, prehospital treatment strategy using cangrelor and tested its pharmacodynamic effects in a model using healthy volunteers.
METHODS
We conducted a dose-finding, open-label, pilot trial including 12 healthy volunteers and tested three ascending bolus infusions of cangrelor (5 mg, 10 mg and 20 mg) and a bolus infusion followed by a continuous infusion via an intravenous (IV) flow regulator. Platelet function was assessed using multiple electrode aggregometry (MEA), vasodilator-stimulated phosphoprotein phosphorylation assay (VASP-P) and the platelet function analyzer. In an ex vivo experiment, epinephrine was used to counteract the antiplatelet effect of cangrelor.
RESULTS
All cangrelor bolus infusions resulted in immediate and pronounced platelet inhibition. Bolus infusions of cangrelor 20 mg resulted in sufficient platelet inhibition assessed by MEA for 20 min in 90% of subjects. Infusion of cangrelor via the IV flow regulator resulted in sufficient platelet inhibition throughout the course of administration. Ex vivo epinephrine, in concentrations of 200 and 500 ng/mL was able to partially reverse the antiplatelet effect of cangrelor in a dose-dependent manner.
CONCLUSIONS
Weight-adapted bolus infusions followed by a continuous infusion of cangrelor via IV flow regulator result in immediate and pronounced platelet inhibition in healthy subjects. Cangrelor given as weight-adapted bolus infusion followed by a continuous infusion using an IV flow regulator may be a viable treatment approach for effective and well controllable prehospital platelet inhibition.
TRIAL REGISTRATION
EC (Medical University of Vienna) 1835/2019 and EudraCT 2019-002792-34 .
PubMed: 35422039
DOI: 10.1186/s12959-022-00377-z -
Journal of Pain Research 2022There has been increasing use of ketamine at subanesthetic doses as an adjunct to opioids in perioperative pain management. There are several known adverse drug effects...
Adverse Effects Associated with Patient-Controlled Analgesia with Ketamine Combined with Opioids and Ketamine Infusion with PCA Bolus in Postoperative Spine Patients: A Retrospective Review.
OBJECTIVE
There has been increasing use of ketamine at subanesthetic doses as an adjunct to opioids in perioperative pain management. There are several known adverse drug effects (ADEs) associated with ketamine. However, the incidence of ADEs with ketamine infusions with patient-controlled analgesia (PCA) boluses compared with combined opioid and ketamine PCAs is not well described. The objectives of this study were to compare the incidence and type of ADEs in postoperative spine surgery patients on ketamine infusions with as-needed PCA boluses to patients on combined opioid and ketamine PCAs.
METHODS
The medical records of patients who underwent spine surgery between March 2016 and March 2020 who were postoperatively treated with a ketamine infusion and as-needed PCA boluses and parenteral opioids or treated with a combined opioid and ketamine PCA were reviewed. Perioperative information including patient characteristics and preoperative morphine equivalent daily dose (MEDD) were collected. Patient charts were reviewed for ADEs including psychological and neurological side effects, nausea, and new-onset tachycardia.
RESULTS
A total of 315 patients met the inclusion criteria and were included in the final analysis. Of these patients, 121 experienced at least one ADE (38%). Sixteen of the 68 ketamine infusion with PCA bolus patients (24%), 77 of the 203 hydromorphone and ketamine patients (38%), and 28 of the 44 morphine and ketamine patients (64%) experienced an ADE [p<0.01]. In patients with preoperative MEDD ≤ 90, nausea was the only ADE that differed significantly among the three groups.
CONCLUSION
This retrospective analysis suggests that postoperative spine patients treated with a ketamine infusion with as-needed PCA boluses and parenteral opioids were associated with fewer ADEs when compared to an intravenous combined opioid and ketamine PCA. In patients with preoperative MEDD ≤ 90, nausea with and without emesis was the only ADE that showed statistically significant difference amongst the three groups.
PubMed: 36247824
DOI: 10.2147/JPR.S358770 -
Journal of the American Heart... Jun 2017In patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) with a potent P2Y inhibitor, ticagrelor, was inferior to... (Randomized Controlled Trial)
Randomized Controlled Trial
Ticagrelor and Eptifibatide Bolus Versus Ticagrelor and Eptifibatide Bolus With 2-Hour Infusion in High-Risk Acute Coronary Syndromes Patients Undergoing Early Percutaneous Coronary Intervention.
BACKGROUND
In patients with non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, inhibition of platelet aggregation (IPA) with a potent P2Y inhibitor, ticagrelor, was inferior to tirofiban infusion at 2 hours, indicating that glycoprotein IIb/IIIa inhibitors are still needed. Ticagrelor and eptifibatide bolus only may maximally inhibit platelet aggregation and decrease bleeding, but IPA with ticagrelor and eptifibatide bolus versus 2-hour infusion is unknown.
METHODS AND RESULTS
A total of 70 P2Y-naïve patients, with high-risk non-ST-segment elevation acute coronary syndromes, were randomized to ticagrelor and eptifibatide bolus (group 1) versus ticagrelor and eptifibatide bolus with 2-hour infusion (group 2). Levels of IPA with ADP, thrombin receptor-activating peptide, collagen, and high on-treatment platelet reactivity were measured by light transmission aggregometry at baseline and at 2, 6, and 24 hours after percutaneous coronary intervention in both groups. The primary end point, IPA with ADP 20 μmol/L at 2 hours, was 99.59±0.43% in group 1 versus 99.88±1.0% in group 2 (<0.001 for noninferiority). High on-treatment platelet reactivity with ADP was zero at 2, 6, and 24 hours in both groups. IPA levels with ADP, thrombin receptor-activating peptide, and collagen were significantly higher at 2 and 6 hours than at 24 hours in both groups. Periprocedural myocardial infarction was not significantly different between the groups. Hemoglobin level was significantly less at 24 hours versus baseline in group 2 (13.35±1.8 versus 12.38±1.8 g/dL, respectively; <0.01).
CONCLUSIONS
Ticagrelor and eptifibatide bolus maximally inhibited platelet aggregation at 2 hours, which was associated with no significant hemoglobin drop after percutaneous coronary intervention. This obviates the need for eptifibatide 2-hour infusion and might decrease bleeding complications.
CLINICAL TRIAL REGISTRATION
URL: http://www.clinicaltrials.gov. Unique identifier: NCT01919723.
Topics: Acute Coronary Syndrome; Adenosine; Cardiac Catheterization; Coronary Angiography; Dose-Response Relationship, Drug; Drug Administration Schedule; Electrocardiography; Eptifibatide; Female; Follow-Up Studies; Humans; Infusions, Intravenous; Male; Middle Aged; Peptides; Percutaneous Coronary Intervention; Platelet Aggregation; Platelet Aggregation Inhibitors; Platelet Glycoprotein GPIIb-IIIa Complex; Prospective Studies; Purinergic P2Y Receptor Antagonists; Single-Blind Method; Ticagrelor; Time Factors; Treatment Outcome
PubMed: 28611098
DOI: 10.1161/JAHA.117.005562